Players Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

20

5

+7

93

6:2

7

1

7.5

+13%

21

14

3

+7

80

4:2

7

1

6.8

0%

22

15

5

+7

72

3:2

7

0

6.3

+2%

19

21

7

-2

68

3:6

5

1

5.5

-3%

11

19

3

-8

43

0:2

0

1

4.8

-26%

Total

100

89

23

+11

356

16:14

26

4

6.2

-3%

GODSENT Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

16

4

+12

83

3:2

8

4

7.6

+20%

17

22

9

-5

83

3:0

4

0

6.0

-4%

15

19

8

-4

73

2:2

5

0

5.6

-4%

17

22

2

-5

58

4:6

2

0

5.2

-11%

12

21

6

-9

47

2:6

2

0

4.5

-21%

Total

89

100

29

-11

344

14:16

21

4

5.8

-4%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Players vs GODSENT by the Bo3.gg Team

on Inferno Analysis

demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for on Inferno were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Players on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Players, as they managed to secure 0 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Players on Inferno included Hobbit, who contributed 27 kills, and sh1ro, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10679 total damage, Players couldn't prevent from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Players struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date