0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
51.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
16.64.7
M4A1 kills on a map
154.491
HE damage (avg/round)
11.43.4
Smoke thrown on a map
2614.6931
Player score (round)
34651011
Player score (round)
34681011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
70%
Anubis
65%
Dust II
50%
Inferno
27%
Vertigo
17%
Mirage
12%
Nuke
9%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
30%
23
10
Anubis
65%
17
13
Dust II
50%
4
5
Inferno
60%
25
4
Vertigo
17%
12
21
Mirage
38%
13
25
Nuke
59%
17
25
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
1
Anubis
0%
1
1
Dust II
0%
2
0
Inferno
33%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Mirage
50%
4
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Info
Match analysis of Galorys vs Hawks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Galorys and Hawks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Dust II, and victory was secured by Galorys. The MVP of this match was detr0ittJ.
Galorys analytics
The team Galorys secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Galorys were detr0ittJ contributed 40 kills and tomate contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18374 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Galorys held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Hawks analytics
The team Hawks managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Hawks were guidimon contributed 38 kills and kun contributed 31 kills. 16691 of total damage by Hawks could not prevent Galorys from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Hawks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments