0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6074
Speed Round (sec)
00:17s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38971011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
60%
Vertigo
42%
Inferno
36%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
21%
Mirage
19%
Nuke
5%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
60%
15
13
Vertigo
11%
9
21
Inferno
72%
18
4
Dust II
33%
3
0
Ancient
25%
20
10
Mirage
38%
13
20
Nuke
59%
17
23
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
79
Vertigo
53%
15
38
Inferno
36%
28
14
Dust II
0%
1
2
Ancient
46%
35
22
Mirage
57%
35
12
Nuke
54%
35
19
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Galorys vs Case by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Galorys and Case, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by Case. The MVP of this match was ninjaZ.
Case analytics
The team Case secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Case were nyezin contributed 18 kills and RICIOLI contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8629 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Galorys analytics
The team Galorys managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Galorys were ninjaZ contributed 21 kills and Koala contributed 18 kills. 8373 of total damage by Galorys could not prevent Case from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Galorys struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments