0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Player score (round)
35051010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
35%
Dust II
15%
Inferno
12%
Nuke
7%
Ancient
4%
Anubis
2%
Mirage
1%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
35%
23
24
Dust II
56%
9
12
Inferno
51%
45
5
Nuke
60%
35
29
Ancient
37%
43
18
Anubis
46%
28
17
Mirage
42%
12
48
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
74
Dust II
71%
17
10
Inferno
63%
40
0
Nuke
53%
30
27
Ancient
33%
24
15
Anubis
44%
36
6
Mirage
41%
29
37
Last results
Info
Match analysis of Galorys vs BESTIA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Galorys and BESTIA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by BESTIA. The MVP of this match was hoax.
BESTIA analytics
The team BESTIA secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BESTIA were naz contributed 25 kills and tomaszin contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11485 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BESTIA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Galorys analytics
The team Galorys managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Galorys were hoax contributed 26 kills and ninjaZ contributed 25 kills. 11288 of total damage by Galorys could not prevent BESTIA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Galorys struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments