0 Comments
113
104
29
+9
426
16:13
26
6
+7%
Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:51s00:39s
Deagle kills on a map
71.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
22.15.4
Shots (total/round)
8916
Player score (round)
43491012
Player score (round)
35191012
Player score (round)
49761012
Shots (total/round)
8416
Shots (total/round)
12216
Damage (total/round)
40073
Info
Map Analysis of Nigma Galaxy SW vs SAW Youngsters by the Bo3.gg Team
Nigma Galaxy SW on Inferno Analysis
Nigma Galaxy SW demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Nigma Galaxy SW on Inferno were Chawzyyy, who contributed 25 kills, and twist, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 12364 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Nigma Galaxy SW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
SAW Youngsters on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for SAW Youngsters, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for SAW Youngsters on Inferno included LucKyMaNN, who contributed 25 kills, and Shr, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10953 total damage, SAW Youngsters couldn't prevent Nigma Galaxy SW from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, SAW Youngsters struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments