0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6027
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.85.9
Damage (total/round)
39373
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37831010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
65%
Dust II
61%
Nuke
48%
Vertigo
31%
Mirage
17%
Ancient
14%
Inferno
4%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
2
0
Dust II
100%
1
1
Nuke
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
2
1
Mirage
25%
4
1
Ancient
33%
3
1
Inferno
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
35%
48
18
Dust II
39%
33
8
Nuke
48%
46
5
Vertigo
31%
13
32
Mirage
42%
55
5
Ancient
47%
49
5
Inferno
46%
13
32
Info
Match analysis of G2 Ares vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between G2 Ares and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Dust II, and victory was secured by G2 Ares. The MVP of this match was kl1m.
G2 Ares analytics
The team G2 Ares secured 26 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Dust II. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for G2 Ares were kl1m contributed 35 kills and tAk contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17157 overall damage.
On the defensive side, G2 Ares held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 17 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were XELLOW contributed 40 kills and 7kick contributed 23 kills. 14546 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent G2 Ares from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments