0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Player score (round)
40191010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37831010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
63%
Mirage
40%
Inferno
18%
Anubis
18%
Vertigo
13%
Ancient
10%
Dust II
2%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
6
Mirage
40%
10
3
Inferno
44%
9
0
Anubis
50%
10
0
Vertigo
33%
3
5
Ancient
31%
13
1
Dust II
50%
6
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
63%
27
2
Mirage
0%
0
17
Inferno
62%
26
1
Anubis
68%
40
1
Vertigo
20%
10
10
Ancient
41%
34
4
Dust II
48%
29
1
Info
Match analysis of G2 Ares vs GenOne by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between G2 Ares and GenOne, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Dust II, and victory was secured by GenOne. The MVP of this match was Kursy.
GenOne analytics
The team GenOne secured 32 out of 57 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Dust II. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GenOne were Kursy contributed 64 kills and drac contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22306 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GenOne held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
G2 Ares analytics
The team G2 Ares managed to secure 25 out of 57 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for G2 Ares were kl1m contributed 54 kills and tAk contributed 47 kills. 21493 of total damage by G2 Ares could not prevent GenOne from securing the victory
On the defensive side, G2 Ares struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments