G2 Ares Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

15

4

-1

76

3:2

2

0

6.3

+3%

13

14

3

-1

77

2:3

3

0

6.1

+3%

9

17

6

-8

66

4:0

0

0

5.6

-20%

10

11

1

-1

51

0:3

3

0

4.9

-2%

7

15

7

-8

42

0:3

1

0

4.0

-16%

Total

53

72

21

-19

311

9:11

9

0

5.3

-6%

fnatic Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

9

0

+12

105

2:1

8

1

8.2

+29%

17

13

5

+4

87

2:3

5

0

6.8

+11%

14

9

2

+5

65

3:0

3

0

6.7

+10%

11

9

5

+2

68

2:1

1

0

6.1

+4%

8

13

8

-5

63

2:4

2

0

5.4

-14%

Total

71

53

20

+18

388

11:9

19

1

6.6

+8%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 Ares vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic on Inferno Analysis

fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno were blameF, who contributed 21 kills, and MATYS, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7766 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


G2 Ares on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for G2 Ares, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for G2 Ares on Inferno included tAk, who contributed 14 kills, and fNk, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6229 total damage, G2 Ares couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 Ares struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date