0 Comments
134
158
40
-24
336
24:21
30
0
Mirage5.5
+11%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Nuke
50%
Anubis
50%
Inferno
25%
Ancient
25%
Mirage
2%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Nuke
0%
4
1
Anubis
50%
2
0
Inferno
25%
8
1
Ancient
0%
0
1
Mirage
18%
11
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Ancient
25%
4
0
Mirage
20%
5
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- wlllw
Info
Match analysis of FyR vs Octagonal Disposition by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FyR and Octagonal Disposition, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, and victory was secured by FyR. The MVP of this match was lame.
FyR analytics
The team FyR secured 26 out of 45 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FyR were lame contributed 38 kills and Haski4 contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16632 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FyR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Octagonal Disposition analytics
The team Octagonal Disposition managed to secure 19 out of 45 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Octagonal Disposition were RainbowGod- contributed 35 kills and rAge contributed 30 kills. 15140 of total damage by Octagonal Disposition could not prevent FyR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Octagonal Disposition struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments