DMS Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

9

5

+9

84

2:0

5

0

7.3

+33%

16

16

3

0

81

3:1

3

0

6.6

0%

15

12

5

+3

85

3:4

3

0

6.5

+5%

11

19

5

-8

59

4:1

2

0

5.7

-15%

7

14

5

-7

48

1:3

1

0

4.6

-24%

Total

67

70

23

-3

356

13:9

14

0

6.1

0%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

13

2

+6

103

4:2

3

1

7.7

+28%

19

12

2

+7

82

1:2

5

0

6.9

+28%

12

14

6

-2

57

3:2

2

1

5.8

-14%

11

12

7

-1

57

0:1

4

1

5.7

-9%

9

19

8

-10

64

1:6

2

0

4.4

-31%

Total

70

70

25

0

363

9:13

16

3

6.1

0%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of DMS vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were simke, who contributed 19 kills, and aVN, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7991 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


DMS on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for DMS, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for DMS on Inferno included sm3t, who contributed 18 kills, and kAlash, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7841 total damage, DMS couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date