0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
94.4189
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.84.1
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
14.44.1
M4A1 kills on a map
94.4189
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
57.216.3
Galil damage (avg/round)
19.75.9
Smoke thrown on a map
1514.5022
Damage (avg/round)
144.71871.7
Player score (round)
37301010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
53%
Inferno
42%
Vertigo
32%
Ancient
23%
Mirage
20%
Dust II
10%
Anubis
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
2
35
Inferno
42%
38
0
Vertigo
35%
17
14
Ancient
54%
41
7
Mirage
47%
43
1
Dust II
50%
24
5
Anubis
35%
26
23
Last 5 maps
Nuke
53%
17
1
Inferno
0%
0
13
Vertigo
67%
3
5
Ancient
77%
31
0
Mirage
67%
12
1
Dust II
40%
5
5
Anubis
39%
18
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of DMS vs HOTU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DMS and HOTU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by HOTU. The MVP of this match was mizu.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HOTU were mizu contributed 41 kills and anttzz contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15652 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HOTU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were AW contributed 23 kills and kAlash contributed 24 kills. 10630 of total damage by DMS could not prevent HOTU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments