0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:14s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Openning kills on a map
7.482.8624
Multikill x-
4
AWP kills on a map
276.4849
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
42601011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
83%
Anubis
75%
Nuke
67%
Mirage
50%
Dust II
30%
Ancient
30%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
83%
6
3
Anubis
25%
8
6
Nuke
0%
0
3
Mirage
50%
14
0
Dust II
80%
5
0
Ancient
50%
10
2
Inferno
50%
14
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Anubis
100%
2
1
Nuke
67%
6
0
Mirage
0%
3
3
Dust II
50%
2
0
Ancient
80%
5
0
Inferno
50%
2
1
Info
Match analysis of DMS vs Heimo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DMS and Heimo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Dust II, Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by DMS. The MVP of this match was sFade8.
DMS analytics
The team DMS secured 45 out of 79 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for DMS were sFade8 contributed 62 kills and H1te contributed 68 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 30272 overall damage.
On the defensive side, DMS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Heimo analytics
The team Heimo managed to secure 34 out of 79 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Heimo were elma contributed 62 kills and Welho contributed 51 kills. 28083 of total damage by Heimo could not prevent DMS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Heimo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments