Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:25s
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.5022
Smoke thrown on a map
1814.5022
USP kills on a map
31.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
15.84.8
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.74.1
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
205.9
Speed Round (sec)
00:20s01:55s
Player score (round)
36321010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
15%
Nuke
14%
Mirage
9%
Dust II
8%
Ancient
7%
Vertigo
3%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
29%
21
16
Nuke
0%
2
19
Mirage
48%
25
1
Dust II
52%
21
1
Ancient
50%
28
7
Vertigo
36%
11
9
Inferno
37%
30
1
Last 5 maps
Anubis
44%
34
12
Nuke
14%
7
44
Mirage
39%
31
10
Dust II
60%
10
8
Ancient
43%
30
5
Vertigo
33%
12
40
Inferno
39%
36
4
Last results
Past matches
- llwll
- wllll
Info
Match analysis of DMS vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DMS and EYEBALLERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by DMS. The MVP of this match was sm3t.
DMS analytics
The team DMS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for DMS were sm3t contributed 32 kills and AW contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15108 overall damage.
On the defensive side, DMS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were HEAP contributed 31 kills and JW contributed 29 kills. 12352 of total damage by EYEBALLERS could not prevent DMS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments