Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:26s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
124
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
26.85.8
Damage (total/round)
39973
Player score (round)
39561011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
55%
Anubis
43%
Vertigo
22%
Nuke
14%
Mirage
13%
Ancient
12%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
36
Anubis
43%
14
5
Vertigo
62%
13
7
Nuke
50%
22
1
Mirage
43%
7
17
Ancient
44%
18
6
Last 5 maps
Inferno
55%
11
12
Anubis
0%
0
38
Vertigo
40%
10
6
Nuke
64%
14
13
Mirage
56%
18
7
Ancient
56%
18
8
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ENCE vs FURIA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ENCE and FURIA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, and victory was secured by FURIA. The MVP of this match was yuurih.
FURIA analytics
The team FURIA secured 26 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FURIA were yuurih contributed 39 kills and KSCERATO contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16269 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FURIA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ENCE analytics
The team ENCE managed to secure 17 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ENCE were hades contributed 31 kills and gla1ve contributed 22 kills. 13118 of total damage by ENCE could not prevent FURIA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ENCE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments