0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:24s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:24s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:24s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:24s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.62
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3011
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.23.6
Damage (total/round)
42773
Player score (round)
35351010
Player score (round)
35061010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
25%
Anubis
17%
Ancient
4%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Inferno
0%
0
3
Nuke
67%
6
2
Mirage
75%
4
3
Anubis
67%
6
1
Ancient
71%
7
0
Dust II
67%
3
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
2
2
Inferno
50%
2
2
Nuke
100%
2
7
Mirage
100%
4
2
Anubis
50%
2
0
Ancient
75%
4
3
Dust II
67%
3
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of FURIA fe vs MIBR fe by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FURIA fe and MIBR fe, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Vertigo, and victory was secured by FURIA fe. The MVP of this match was .
FURIA fe analytics
The team FURIA fe secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps . They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FURIA fe were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FURIA fe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR fe analytics
The team MIBR fe managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR fe were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by MIBR fe could not prevent FURIA fe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR fe struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments