FTW Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

13

5

+5

92

1:1

3

1

6.9

+13%

19

17

1

+2

74

2:1

7

1

6.5

+6%

10

15

10

-5

73

2:5

2

0

5.4

-14%

14

13

1

+1

49

2:3

3

0

5.4

-7%

11

18

3

-7

55

4:2

0

0

5.3

-20%

Total

72

76

20

-4

343

11:12

15

2

5.9

-5%

ex-RAPTORS EC Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

15

2

+2

87

2:0

4

0

6.7

+14%

16

16

5

0

97

4:3

4

0

6.6

+12%

17

14

4

+3

80

1:4

7

0

6.1

+14%

16

15

0

+1

57

2:2

5

0

5.7

-4%

9

14

3

-5

39

3:2

2

0

5.0

-34%

Total

75

74

14

+1

359

12:11

22

0

6.0

+1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of FTW vs ex-RAPTORS EC by the Bo3.gg Team

ex-RAPTORS EC on Inferno Analysis

ex-RAPTORS EC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ex-RAPTORS EC on Inferno were zodi, who contributed 17 kills, and Skrimo, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8254 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ex-RAPTORS EC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FTW on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for FTW, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FTW on Inferno included NOPEEJ, who contributed 18 kills, and stadodo, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7886 total damage, FTW couldn't prevent ex-RAPTORS EC from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, FTW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date