0 Comments
21
59
5
-38
236
2:10
3
0
Ancient4.2
-11%
Teams advantage
Score
7.6
4.2
Nuke0
Win Rounds
0
0
Nuke0
Kills
0
0
Nuke0
Damage
0
0
Nuke0
Economy
341.2K
199K
Nuke0
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
80%
Nuke
75%
Inferno
50%
Overpass
50%
Anubis
50%
Ancient
35%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
80%
15
1
Nuke
75%
16
0
Inferno
50%
14
0
Overpass
50%
6
11
Anubis
50%
10
3
Ancient
35%
17
4
Mirage
0%
0
14
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
Info
Match analysis of FTW vs CALAOSCORNOS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FTW and CALAOSCORNOS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, and victory was secured by FTW. The MVP of this match was pr.
FTW analytics
The team FTW secured 13 out of 13 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FTW were pr contributed 16 kills and Ag1L contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 5839 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FTW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
CALAOSCORNOS analytics
The team CALAOSCORNOS managed to secure 0 out of 13 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for CALAOSCORNOS were M1KA contributed 5 kills and c0mplex contributed 7 kills. 2831 of total damage by CALAOSCORNOS could not prevent FTW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, CALAOSCORNOS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments