Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
31.8164
Deagle kills on a map
31.6558
Deagle kills on a map
31.6558
AK47 kills on a map
146.5019
Trades on a map
8.963.428
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Player score (round)
35551010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
75%
Anubis
37%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
0
Anubis
100%
5
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Mirage
67%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
75%
4
0
Anubis
63%
8
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Mirage
67%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Take Flyte Frauds vs Zero MarksMen by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Take Flyte Frauds and Zero MarksMen, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Take Flyte Frauds. The MVP of this match was gir.
Take Flyte Frauds analytics
The team Take Flyte Frauds secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Take Flyte Frauds were gir contributed 16 kills and hambooga contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7231 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Take Flyte Frauds held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero MarksMen analytics
The team Zero MarksMen managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero MarksMen were mooseM contributed 10 kills and Enzo contributed 8 kills. 4692 of total damage by Zero MarksMen could not prevent Take Flyte Frauds from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero MarksMen struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments