57
79
29
-22
322
8:12
13
0
Ancient5.4
0%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:35s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Lineups
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Anubis
100%
Nuke
75%
Mirage
67%
Ancient
33%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Anubis
100%
5
0
Nuke
75%
4
0
Mirage
67%
3
0
Ancient
33%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- llll
Info
Match analysis of Frauds vs LONG SEASON by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Frauds and LONG SEASON, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Frauds. The MVP of this match was iNK__.
Frauds analytics
The team Frauds secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Frauds were iNK__ contributed 15 kills and Termina contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8200 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Frauds held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LONG SEASON analytics
The team LONG SEASON managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LONG SEASON were ethex contributed 14 kills and legacy contributed 11 kills. 6442 of total damage by LONG SEASON could not prevent Frauds from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LONG SEASON struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments