0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
60%
Overpass
43%
Dust II
24%
Ancient
11%
Inferno
9%
Nuke
8%
Vertigo
6%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
5
0
Dust II
67%
18
1
Ancient
60%
10
0
Inferno
41%
17
0
Nuke
50%
8
0
Vertigo
50%
8
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
60%
5
3
Overpass
43%
14
1
Dust II
43%
7
1
Ancient
71%
28
0
Inferno
50%
2
1
Nuke
58%
31
0
Vertigo
56%
16
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- llwwl
Info
Match analysis of Fourteen vs ThunderFlash by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fourteen and ThunderFlash, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Fourteen. The MVP of this match was whatz.
Fourteen analytics
The team Fourteen secured 24 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fourteen were whatz contributed 24 kills and PR contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10004 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fourteen held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ThunderFlash analytics
The team ThunderFlash managed to secure 0 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ThunderFlash were pawkoem contributed 18 kills and Mride contributed 13 kills. 7939 of total damage by ThunderFlash could not prevent Fourteen from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ThunderFlash struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments