Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Kills on a map
34.9616.9373
Damage (avg/round)
152.51871.7
Headshots on a map
15.960.3159
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
58%
Nuke
47%
Mirage
44%
Vertigo
30%
Ancient
9%
Anubis
4%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
3
Mirage
0%
3
1
Vertigo
100%
1
1
Ancient
40%
5
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Inferno
0%
1
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
58%
12
2
Nuke
47%
17
1
Mirage
44%
18
0
Vertigo
70%
10
0
Ancient
31%
13
1
Anubis
37%
27
0
Inferno
0%
1
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwllw
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of FORZE Reload vs WOPA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FORZE Reload and WOPA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by WOPA. The MVP of this match was sL1m3.
WOPA analytics
The team WOPA secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for WOPA were sL1m3 contributed 35 kills and Vster contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7897 overall damage.
On the defensive side, WOPA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FORZE Reload analytics
The team FORZE Reload managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FORZE Reload were rikon contributed 12 kills and malinov contributed 9 kills. 5977 of total damage by FORZE Reload could not prevent WOPA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FORZE Reload struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments