0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
72%
Dust II
67%
Nuke
55%
Vertigo
52%
Mirage
43%
Ancient
23%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
1
Dust II
100%
3
1
Nuke
0%
1
3
Vertigo
0%
0
4
Mirage
0%
3
1
Ancient
38%
8
0
Overpass
0%
1
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
28%
18
1
Dust II
33%
12
2
Nuke
55%
20
1
Vertigo
52%
21
0
Mirage
43%
7
10
Ancient
61%
18
0
Overpass
0%
3
12
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwllw
- wwllw
Info
Match analysis of Forward vs VP.Prodigy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Forward and VP.Prodigy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by VP.Prodigy. The MVP of this match was lom1k.
VP.Prodigy analytics
The team VP.Prodigy secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy were lom1k contributed 31 kills and latt1kk contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13019 overall damage.
On the defensive side, VP.Prodigy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Forward analytics
The team Forward managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Forward were JIaYm contributed 28 kills and K0s contributed 21 kills. 11752 of total damage by Forward could not prevent VP.Prodigy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Forward struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments