0 Comments
314
337
40
-23
365
47:50
73
7
Inferno5.7
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
Q
62%
Mirage
Q
50%
Overpass
44%
Anubis
33%
Inferno
25%
Nuke
17%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
38%
8
0
Mirage
50%
4
6
Overpass
44%
9
0
Anubis
33%
6
0
Inferno
75%
4
3
Nuke
17%
6
5
Vertigo
0%
0
12
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
1
1
Overpass
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwll
- ww
Info
Match analysis of Forward vs Question Mark by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Forward and Question Mark, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, Overpass, and victory was secured by Forward. The MVP of this match was kade0.
Forward analytics
The team Forward secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Forward were kade0 contributed 77 kills and ProbLeM contributed 77 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 36375 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Forward held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Question Mark analytics
The team Question Mark managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Question Mark were MaSvAl contributed 69 kills and nifee3 contributed 67 kills. 35541 of total damage by Question Mark could not prevent Forward from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Question Mark struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments