Same game multi bounty hunt
with a 40 000 usd prizepool!
0 Comments
190
223
62
-33
338
31:32
37
4
Mirage5.5
0%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
12.43.4
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.64.2
HE damage (avg/round)
15.93.4
HE damage (avg/round)
17.33.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:11s00:35s
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3031
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
12.23.7
AK47 kills on a map
136.3346
AK47 damage (avg/round)
60.525.2
USP kills on a map
31.5954
Ancient
53%
Inferno
22%
Mirage
19%
Train
16%
Nuke
13%
Dust II
7%
Anubis
6%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
53%
30
7
Inferno
68%
19
6
Mirage
57%
30
6
Train
64%
25
1
Nuke
50%
16
16
Dust II
50%
10
30
Anubis
50%
12
20
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
74
Inferno
46%
35
8
Mirage
38%
50
24
Train
48%
23
17
Nuke
63%
51
1
Dust II
57%
23
24
Anubis
56%
55
0
In the CS2 match between fnatic and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, Anubis, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was blameF.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were blameF contributed 68 kills and jambo contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24424 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were maden contributed 49 kills and brutmonster contributed 42 kills. 22325 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments