Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:26s
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6229
Smoke thrown on a map
2114.6931
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5929
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
USP kills on a map
41.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
18.84.7
Headshots on a map
20.010.3141
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Inferno
44%
Mirage
36%
Nuke
15%
Anubis
14%
Ancient
12%
Vertigo
9%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
2
0
Inferno
44%
9
21
Mirage
43%
7
25
Nuke
33%
3
28
Anubis
33%
12
19
Ancient
67%
30
0
Vertigo
50%
16
19
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
6
Inferno
0%
1
50
Mirage
79%
19
12
Nuke
48%
25
12
Anubis
47%
30
6
Ancient
55%
33
8
Vertigo
41%
22
12
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and Sangal, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was MATYS.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were MATYS contributed 27 kills and KRIMZ contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8779 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sangal were Yxngstxr contributed 22 kills and xfl0ud contributed 16 kills. 7549 of total damage by Sangal could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments