Ended
1
Full stats

0 Comments

fnatic Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

16

3

+10

84

4:2

8

0

7.3

+18%

19

20

5

-1

70

4:3

5

0

6.2

-3%

15

14

6

+1

67

3:2

3

0

6.0

+2%

16

14

6

+2

65

0:1

3

1

5.9

+1%

15

17

7

-2

71

3:6

4

0

5.4

-14%

Total

91

81

27

+10

356

14:14

23

1

6.2

+1%

Sampi Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

20

7

+4

91

6:2

7

0

7.1

+11%

19

18

5

+1

77

3:3

3

0

6.2

-1%

16

17

4

-1

58

2:2

3

0

5.5

-11%

11

17

6

-6

42

1:1

1

2

5.2

-23%

11

20

7

-9

51

2:6

0

0

4.5

-25%

Total

81

92

29

-11

319

14:14

14

2

5.7

-10%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of fnatic vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic on Inferno Analysis

fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno were MATYS, who contributed 26 kills, and afro, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9975 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sampi on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sampi, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sampi on Inferno included manguss, who contributed 24 kills, and ZEDKO, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8942 total damage, Sampi couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sampi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date