0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Headshots (total/map)
238
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
47.116.7
Smoke thrown on a map
5715.0371
Smoke thrown on a map
5115.0371
Flash duration on a map (sec)
03:19s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
16630
Smoke thrown on a map
5115.0371
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
40073
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
49%
Dust II
40%
Inferno
35%
Ancient
33%
Mirage
7%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
69%
13
11
Dust II
40%
5
18
Inferno
85%
13
6
Ancient
33%
6
22
Mirage
40%
15
6
Overpass
50%
12
3
Vertigo
0%
4
21
Last 5 maps
Nuke
20%
10
3
Dust II
80%
5
2
Inferno
50%
6
10
Ancient
0%
1
7
Mirage
33%
6
2
Overpass
50%
2
3
Vertigo
0%
0
15
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was mezii.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were mezii contributed 71 kills and roeJ contributed 67 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34351 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were Spargo contributed 60 kills and xseveN contributed 68 kills. 31716 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments