Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:26s
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.54
Player score (round)
34871011
Player score (round)
40351011
Player score (round)
34871011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
33%
Ancient
18%
Dust II
14%
Mirage
7%
Anubis
5%
Inferno
3%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
33%
3
28
Ancient
65%
31
0
Dust II
67%
3
0
Mirage
43%
7
25
Anubis
31%
13
19
Inferno
44%
9
21
Vertigo
50%
16
19
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
11
Ancient
47%
19
5
Dust II
53%
15
0
Mirage
50%
20
0
Anubis
36%
11
12
Inferno
47%
19
1
Vertigo
50%
10
4
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, Dust II, and victory was secured by DMS. The MVP of this match was blameF.
DMS analytics
The team DMS secured 35 out of 65 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for DMS were kAlash contributed 49 kills and AW contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22168 overall damage.
On the defensive side, DMS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic managed to secure 30 out of 65 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for fnatic were blameF contributed 54 kills and MATYS contributed 55 kills. 24126 of total damage by fnatic could not prevent DMS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments