0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
64%
Inferno
33%
Mirage
32%
Dust II
25%
Overpass
13%
Nuke
3%
Vertigo
1%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
20%
5
4
Inferno
58%
12
1
Mirage
25%
4
12
Dust II
0%
1
16
Overpass
67%
3
11
Nuke
50%
2
12
Vertigo
57%
7
2
Last 5 maps
Ancient
84%
19
4
Inferno
25%
8
37
Mirage
57%
28
12
Dust II
25%
4
41
Overpass
54%
24
12
Nuke
47%
19
12
Vertigo
58%
24
6
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllww
- wwwwl
Info
Match analysis of fnatic Rising vs Astralis Talent by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic Rising and Astralis Talent, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Astralis Talent. The MVP of this match was Fessor.
Astralis Talent analytics
The team Astralis Talent secured 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Astralis Talent were Fessor contributed 26 kills and brzer contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11052 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Astralis Talent held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
fnatic Rising analytics
The team fnatic Rising managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for fnatic Rising were Peppzor contributed 18 kills and Maze contributed 20 kills. 9731 of total damage by fnatic Rising could not prevent Astralis Talent from securing the victory
On the defensive side, fnatic Rising struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments