Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2315.0371
HE damage (avg/round)
12.23.4
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6963
Shots (total/round)
8816
Shots (total/round)
8916
Player score (round)
41091012
Damage (total/round)
39273
Player score (round)
36011012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
41%
Overpass
29%
Inferno
24%
Dust II
10%
Vertigo
9%
Ancient
1%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
41%
17
10
Overpass
58%
19
3
Inferno
76%
25
2
Dust II
67%
3
30
Vertigo
38%
8
22
Ancient
63%
8
24
Nuke
67%
15
13
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
58
Overpass
29%
14
25
Inferno
52%
25
13
Dust II
57%
21
17
Vertigo
47%
19
14
Ancient
62%
26
5
Nuke
67%
27
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was rmn.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were rmn contributed 21 kills and stadodo contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9991 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for fnatic were poizon contributed 21 kills and ALEX contributed 21 kills. 8905 of total damage by fnatic could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments