0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
11.23.4
AWP kills on a map
236.5798
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
10530
HE damage (avg/round)
163.4
Player score (round)
37951012
Damage (total/round)
43473
Player score (round)
36131012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
42%
Vertigo
40%
Overpass
29%
Nuke
18%
Ancient
12%
Dust II
11%
Inferno
4%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
42%
19
11
Vertigo
33%
9
19
Overpass
62%
21
2
Nuke
64%
14
12
Ancient
63%
8
29
Dust II
67%
3
37
Inferno
70%
27
5
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
27
Vertigo
73%
11
0
Overpass
33%
6
16
Nuke
82%
11
3
Ancient
75%
4
13
Dust II
56%
9
2
Inferno
74%
19
0
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs HEET by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and HEET, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by HEET. The MVP of this match was afro.
HEET analytics
The team HEET secured 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HEET were afro contributed 29 kills and Djoko contributed 26 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13527 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HEET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for fnatic were ALEX contributed 23 kills and mezii contributed 22 kills. 12067 of total damage by fnatic could not prevent HEET from securing the victory
On the defensive side, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments