0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
154.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.916.7
Shots (total/round)
8616
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37801012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Molotov damage (total/round)
8723.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
63%
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
44%
Inferno
21%
Nuke
7%
Mirage
6%
Ancient
3%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
63%
19
2
Dust II
0%
1
37
Vertigo
44%
9
13
Inferno
71%
21
5
Nuke
57%
14
7
Mirage
44%
16
12
Ancient
63%
8
22
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
2
Dust II
50%
2
6
Vertigo
0%
0
9
Inferno
50%
10
1
Nuke
50%
8
4
Mirage
50%
4
1
Ancient
60%
5
2
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs FATE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and FATE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, Overpass, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was KRIMZ.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 46 out of 89 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Overpass. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were KRIMZ contributed 72 kills and mezii contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34603 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FATE analytics
The team FATE managed to secure 43 out of 89 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FATE were Patrick contributed 68 kills and niki1 contributed 61 kills. 32166 of total damage by FATE could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FATE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments