0 Comments
54
74
16
-20
320
10:9
13
1
-14%
Teams advantage Vertigo (M2)
Records Vertigo
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
146.5888
AK47 damage (avg/round)
57.825.3
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:21s00:37s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7229
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
24.15.8
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.34
Assists on a map
10.074.4098
Assists on a map
10.074.4098
Player score (round)
35681011
Info
Map Analysis of FlyQuest vs Ninjas in Pyjamas by the Bo3.gg Team
FlyQuest on Vertigo Analysis
FlyQuest demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FlyQuest on Vertigo were INS, who contributed 24 kills, and Vexite, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 7585 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, FlyQuest held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Ninjas in Pyjamas on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Ninjas in Pyjamas, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Ninjas in Pyjamas on Vertigo included r1nkle, who contributed 18 kills, and BluePho3nix, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6075 total damage, Ninjas in Pyjamas couldn't prevent FlyQuest from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Ninjas in Pyjamas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments