0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:23s
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.2369
USP kills on a map
51.5972
USP damage (avg/round)
18.54.9
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.14.2
USP kills on a map
31.5972
USP damage (avg/round)
13.84.9
HE damage (total/round)
9026.1
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:22s01:23s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:23s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
43%
Mirage
18%
Inferno
16%
Ancient
10%
Anubis
10%
Nuke
9%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
57%
7
12
Mirage
0%
0
23
Inferno
40%
10
6
Ancient
82%
11
5
Anubis
60%
15
4
Nuke
67%
12
10
Vertigo
50%
8
7
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
51
Mirage
18%
22
23
Inferno
56%
9
27
Ancient
72%
18
8
Anubis
50%
30
1
Nuke
58%
26
10
Vertigo
47%
19
8
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of FlyQuest vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FlyQuest and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by FlyQuest. The MVP of this match was dexter.
FlyQuest analytics
The team FlyQuest secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FlyQuest were dexter contributed 34 kills and regali contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15379 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FlyQuest held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were insani contributed 38 kills and Lucaozy contributed 21 kills. 12874 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent FlyQuest from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments