80
70
30
+10
374
11:12
21
0
-6%
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- —
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
D
100%
Ancient
D
75%
Vertigo
67%
Dust II
50%
Anubis
50%
Mirage
27%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
2
Ancient
0%
0
8
Vertigo
67%
6
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Anubis
50%
10
2
Mirage
71%
14
0
Nuke
0%
0
4
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Ancient
75%
4
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Mirage
44%
9
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- llwwl
Info
Map Analysis of FlyQuest RED vs DoomGG by the Bo3.gg Team
FlyQuest RED on Dust II Analysis
FlyQuest RED demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FlyQuest RED on Dust II were BiBiAhn, who contributed 21 kills, and Emy, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8594 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, FlyQuest RED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
DoomGG on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for DoomGG, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for DoomGG on Dust II included -AGB-, who contributed 17 kills, and Civil, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7775 total damage, DoomGG couldn't prevent FlyQuest RED from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, DoomGG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments