0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Inferno
33%
Ancient
28%
Nuke
23%
Mirage
10%
Overpass
3%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
33%
6
3
Inferno
33%
9
7
Ancient
58%
19
6
Nuke
56%
9
19
Mirage
35%
17
1
Overpass
63%
8
8
Anubis
0%
1
21
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
3
1
Inferno
0%
0
13
Ancient
30%
10
2
Nuke
33%
3
6
Mirage
45%
11
0
Overpass
60%
5
0
Anubis
0%
2
6
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlwl
- lwwll
Info
Match analysis of FLUFFY AIMERS vs Badass by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FLUFFY AIMERS and Badass, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by FLUFFY AIMERS. The MVP of this match was sacrifice.
FLUFFY AIMERS analytics
The team FLUFFY AIMERS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FLUFFY AIMERS were sacrifice contributed 51 kills and dea contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20228 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FLUFFY AIMERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Badass analytics
The team Badass managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Badass were Fr3nk1e contributed 37 kills and consti contributed 34 kills. 15400 of total damage by Badass could not prevent FLUFFY AIMERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Badass struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments