0 Comments
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Train
100%
Mirage
49%
Nuke
36%
Inferno
33%
Anubis
12%
Dust II
6%
Ancient
3%
Last 5 maps
Train
100%
1
2
Mirage
51%
39
0
Nuke
36%
22
6
Inferno
33%
6
22
Anubis
45%
44
0
Dust II
56%
16
23
Ancient
53%
58
2
Last 5 maps
Train
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Ancient
50%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- lllwl
Info
Map Analysis of FLuffy Gangsters vs XPERION NXT by the Bo3.gg Team
FLuffy Gangsters on Ancient Analysis
FLuffy Gangsters demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FLuffy Gangsters on Ancient were takanashi, who contributed 18 kills, and Djon8, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 6768 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, FLuffy Gangsters held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
XPERION NXT on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for XPERION NXT, as they managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for XPERION NXT on Ancient included Tr1cky, who contributed 9 kills, and pxsl, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3951 total damage, XPERION NXT couldn't prevent FLuffy Gangsters from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, XPERION NXT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments