0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6
6.2
Vertigo-0.2
Win Rounds
16
14
Vertigo2
Kills
101
104
Vertigo-3
Damage
11.13K
11.04K
Vertigo92
Economy
620.55K
591.2K
Vertigo29350
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
71%
Inferno
67%
Vertigo
f
62%
Dust II
f
60%
Nuke
34%
Mirage
33%
Ancient
20%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
2
Vertigo
100%
1
2
Dust II
100%
2
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Mirage
0%
1
1
Ancient
50%
2
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
71%
14
5
Inferno
67%
27
6
Vertigo
38%
13
4
Dust II
40%
10
15
Nuke
67%
21
2
Mirage
33%
3
29
Ancient
70%
23
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllwl
- wwwww
Info
Match analysis of flowstate vs HONORIS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between flowstate and HONORIS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by flowstate. The MVP of this match was sowalio.
flowstate analytics
The team flowstate secured 0 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for flowstate were sowalio contributed 31 kills and Bels contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11128 overall damage.
On the defensive side, flowstate held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HONORIS analytics
The team HONORIS managed to secure 30 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HONORIS were TaZ contributed 27 kills and SaMey contributed 21 kills. 11036 of total damage by HONORIS could not prevent flowstate from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HONORIS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments