0 Comments
70
77
17
-7
251
9:11
14
1
Inferno5.7
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
f
60%
Mirage
43%
Vertigo
f
40%
Overpass
f
37%
Dust II
f
33%
Nuke
f
29%
Ancient
f
17%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Mirage
20%
5
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Dust II
100%
1
0
Nuke
29%
7
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
40%
20
1
Mirage
63%
19
3
Vertigo
60%
5
8
Overpass
63%
8
3
Dust II
67%
6
8
Nuke
0%
0
24
Ancient
50%
16
5
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
- wlwwl
Info
Match analysis of flowstate vs AVANGAR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between flowstate and AVANGAR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by flowstate. The MVP of this match was sFade8.
flowstate analytics
The team flowstate secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for flowstate were sFade8 contributed 28 kills and sm3t contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11121 overall damage.
On the defensive side, flowstate held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AVANGAR analytics
The team AVANGAR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AVANGAR were BLVCKM4GIC contributed 21 kills and icy contributed 17 kills. 7544 of total damage by AVANGAR could not prevent flowstate from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AVANGAR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments