0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
100%
Vertigo
43%
Nuke
32%
Ancient
25%
Overpass
22%
Mirage
21%
Inferno
19%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
1
2
Vertigo
0%
2
18
Nuke
63%
8
6
Ancient
0%
0
17
Overpass
45%
20
0
Mirage
36%
11
4
Inferno
40%
5
9
Dust II
50%
8
1
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
7
Vertigo
43%
14
9
Nuke
31%
13
3
Ancient
25%
8
21
Overpass
67%
18
8
Mirage
57%
21
6
Inferno
59%
17
15
Dust II
50%
16
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- llwlw
Info
Match analysis of Flames Ascent vs Entropiq by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Flames Ascent and Entropiq, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Overpass, and victory was secured by Entropiq. The MVP of this match was red.
Entropiq analytics
The team Entropiq secured 0 out of 58 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Entropiq were red contributed 53 kills and AJTT contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22543 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Entropiq held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Flames Ascent analytics
The team Flames Ascent managed to secure 58 out of 58 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 10 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Flames Ascent were hAnsi contributed 43 kills and BuNNy contributed 42 kills. 20232 of total damage by Flames Ascent could not prevent Entropiq from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Flames Ascent struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 28 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments