Fiend Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

16

10

4

+6

115

4:0

4

0

8.0

+30%

19

8

2

+11

78

3:1

6

2

7.7

+21%

16

8

5

+8

97

4:1

3

1

7.7

+20%

17

8

7

+9

90

2:1

6

1

7.4

+30%

15

9

5

+6

81

1:2

4

0

6.7

+5%

Total

83

43

23

+40

462

14:5

23

4

7.5

+21%

Sangal Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

17

5

-6

65

0:3

3

0

5.1

-16%

9

15

4

-6

51

1:2

2

0

4.9

-23%

8

17

3

-9

65

1:3

2

0

4.8

-28%

7

17

5

-10

50

0:1

3

0

4.4

-33%

7

18

1

-11

45

3:5

1

0

4.3

-32%

Total

42

84

18

-42

277

5:14

11

0

4.7

-26%

Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Fiend vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team

Fiend on Dust II Analysis

Fiend demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Fiend on Dust II were mar, who contributed 16 kills, and dream3r, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8775 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, Fiend held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sangal on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Sangal, as they managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sangal on Dust II included MAJ3R, who contributed 11 kills, and ngiN, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5259 total damage, Sangal couldn't prevent Fiend from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date