0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:30s
AWP kills on a map
206.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
6521.6
Decoy grenades thrown
41.291
M4A4 kills on a map
133.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
51.812.7
Player score (round)
37231012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Dust II
67%
Overpass
63%
Inferno
43%
Mirage
38%
Nuke
29%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
0
Dust II
67%
9
3
Overpass
63%
8
4
Inferno
57%
7
10
Mirage
88%
17
0
Nuke
71%
7
7
Vertigo
0%
1
20
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
2
Overpass
0%
0
2
Inferno
100%
2
0
Mirage
50%
4
0
Nuke
100%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of Fiend vs ONYX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fiend and ONYX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by Fiend. The MVP of this match was h4rn.
Fiend analytics
The team Fiend secured 32 out of 57 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Mirage. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fiend were h4rn contributed 53 kills and dream3r contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22424 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fiend held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ONYX analytics
The team ONYX managed to secure 25 out of 57 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ONYX were jR contributed 44 kills and Impulse contributed 44 kills. 21017 of total damage by ONYX could not prevent Fiend from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ONYX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments