Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle damage (avg/round)
18.85.4
Decoy grenades thrown
41.291
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
42451012
Player score (round)
37201012
Player score (round)
45141012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
62%
Dust II
51%
Ancient
33%
Overpass
29%
Mirage
29%
Nuke
18%
Inferno
9%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
66
Dust II
71%
24
5
Ancient
83%
6
17
Overpass
67%
18
7
Mirage
73%
56
0
Nuke
52%
25
28
Inferno
61%
23
20
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
62%
13
1
Dust II
20%
10
19
Ancient
50%
2
18
Overpass
38%
8
4
Mirage
44%
9
25
Nuke
70%
30
0
Inferno
70%
10
2
Info
Match analysis of Fiend vs Dignitas by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fiend and Dignitas, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Fiend. The MVP of this match was REDSTAR.
Fiend analytics
The team Fiend secured 32 out of 57 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fiend were REDSTAR contributed 55 kills and v1c7oR contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23529 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fiend held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Dignitas analytics
The team Dignitas managed to secure 25 out of 57 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Dignitas were Hallzerk contributed 37 kills and f0rest contributed 44 kills. 20171 of total damage by Dignitas could not prevent Fiend from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Dignitas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments