Fiend Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

13

2

+7

90

1:1

5

1

7.7

+18%

16

5

2

+11

74

3:1

5

1

7.6

+20%

13

11

5

+2

101

1:3

3

1

7.1

+19%

12

13

3

-1

73

4:0

3

0

6.2

-11%

9

12

0

-3

42

1:5

1

0

4.7

-18%

Total

70

54

12

+16

380

10:10

17

3

6.7

+5%

EC Brugge Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

12

4

+4

73

1:1

3

0

6.5

+11%

13

16

5

-3

87

3:3

3

0

6.2

-1%

10

10

1

0

44

2:0

1

0

5.3

-13%

9

17

4

-8

64

3:5

2

0

5.0

-22%

6

15

2

-9

43

1:1

1

0

4.3

-32%

Total

54

70

16

-16

312

10:10

10

0

5.5

-12%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Fiend vs EC Brugge by the Bo3.gg Team

Fiend on Inferno Analysis

Fiend demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Fiend on Inferno were REDSTAR, who contributed 20 kills, and dream3r, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7602 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Fiend held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Brugge on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Brugge, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Brugge on Inferno included ritchiEE, who contributed 16 kills, and n0tice, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6230 total damage, EC Brugge couldn't prevent Fiend from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Brugge struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date