Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
286.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
70.921.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.92
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
40221012
Player score (round)
34801012
Shots (total/round)
9516
Damage (total/round)
39873
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
70%
Nuke
67%
Inferno
64%
Mirage
38%
Vertigo
33%
Ancient
13%
Overpass
8%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
70%
10
4
Nuke
67%
12
13
Inferno
64%
11
15
Mirage
80%
30
0
Vertigo
0%
1
34
Ancient
80%
5
1
Overpass
64%
11
6
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
3
4
Nuke
0%
2
2
Inferno
0%
1
11
Mirage
42%
12
0
Vertigo
33%
6
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Overpass
56%
9
0
Info
Match analysis of Fiend vs 777 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fiend and 777, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by 777. The MVP of this match was h4rn.
777 analytics
The team 777 secured 40 out of 82 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Ancient. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 777 were H4RR3 contributed 63 kills and Marcelious contributed 55 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28919 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 777 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Fiend analytics
The team Fiend managed to secure 42 out of 82 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Fiend were h4rn contributed 69 kills and bubble contributed 56 kills. 30899 of total damage by Fiend could not prevent 777 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Fiend struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments