Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Shots (total/round)
8816
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Molotov damage (total/round)
10423.8
HE damage (total/round)
13226.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
83%
Dust II
43%
Vertigo
33%
Overpass
17%
Inferno
13%
Mirage
4%
Ancient
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
83%
12
7
Dust II
63%
16
13
Vertigo
100%
1
36
Overpass
67%
12
4
Inferno
70%
23
1
Mirage
63%
16
10
Ancient
71%
7
20
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
2
19
Dust II
20%
5
6
Vertigo
67%
3
15
Overpass
50%
8
7
Inferno
57%
7
4
Mirage
67%
9
3
Ancient
75%
8
2
Info
Match analysis of FaZe vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FaZe and OG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Dust II, and victory was secured by FaZe. The MVP of this match was Twistzz.
FaZe analytics
The team FaZe secured 32 out of 54 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Dust II. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FaZe were Twistzz contributed 54 kills and broky contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20984 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FaZe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
OG analytics
The team OG managed to secure 22 out of 54 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for OG were flameZ contributed 47 kills and nexa contributed 33 kills. 17621 of total damage by OG could not prevent FaZe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments