0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
14.64.6
Smoke thrown on a map
3015.0371
Damage (total/round)
38373
Player score (round)
35711012
Shots (total/round)
9416
Player score (round)
40461012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
40%
Dust II
23%
Inferno
23%
Overpass
21%
Nuke
11%
Mirage
9%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
30
Ancient
40%
10
4
Dust II
67%
9
13
Inferno
71%
17
5
Overpass
67%
9
17
Nuke
29%
7
17
Mirage
53%
17
3
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
12
5
Ancient
0%
0
35
Dust II
44%
9
13
Inferno
48%
23
3
Overpass
88%
8
5
Nuke
40%
10
16
Mirage
62%
13
11
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of FaZe vs Liquid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FaZe and Liquid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by FaZe. The MVP of this match was ropz.
FaZe analytics
The team FaZe secured 19 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FaZe were ropz contributed 34 kills and Twistzz contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13312 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FaZe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Liquid analytics
The team Liquid managed to secure 15 out of 34 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Liquid were NAF contributed 24 kills and EliGE contributed 24 kills. 11152 of total damage by Liquid could not prevent FaZe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Liquid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments