0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:25s
USP kills on a map
41.6027
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.5022
HE damage (avg/round)
13.63.4
Galil kills on a map
51.8164
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
35%
Mirage
27%
Nuke
12%
Ancient
12%
Dust II
7%
Vertigo
7%
Inferno
1%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
40%
10
25
Mirage
71%
17
3
Nuke
56%
25
0
Ancient
65%
17
8
Dust II
43%
7
6
Vertigo
60%
5
26
Inferno
63%
16
5
Last 5 maps
Anubis
75%
12
8
Mirage
44%
9
13
Nuke
44%
9
12
Ancient
53%
19
2
Dust II
50%
2
8
Vertigo
67%
6
2
Inferno
64%
11
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of FaZe vs FlyQuest by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FaZe and FlyQuest, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Anubis, and victory was secured by FaZe. The MVP of this match was frozen.
FaZe analytics
The team FaZe secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FaZe were frozen contributed 47 kills and karrigan contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17980 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FaZe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FlyQuest analytics
The team FlyQuest managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FlyQuest were INS contributed 40 kills and dexter contributed 24 kills. 14211 of total damage by FlyQuest could not prevent FaZe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FlyQuest struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments