0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
61.616
USP damage (avg/round)
18.54.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
72
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:54s
Player score (round)
37721012
Player score (round)
35181012
Player score (round)
36301012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Overpass
30%
Vertigo
29%
Nuke
25%
Inferno
11%
Ancient
10%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
2
6
Overpass
0%
1
2
Vertigo
0%
0
9
Nuke
50%
8
4
Inferno
50%
10
1
Ancient
60%
5
2
Mirage
50%
4
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
29
Overpass
30%
10
13
Vertigo
29%
7
4
Nuke
75%
28
0
Inferno
39%
18
8
Ancient
50%
18
5
Mirage
50%
22
6
Info
Match analysis of FATE vs KOVA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FATE and KOVA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by FATE. The MVP of this match was Airax.
FATE analytics
The team FATE secured 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FATE were niki1 contributed 21 kills and hybrid contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10720 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FATE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KOVA analytics
The team KOVA managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KOVA were Airax contributed 28 kills and Spargo contributed 22 kills. 11337 of total damage by KOVA could not prevent FATE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KOVA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments