Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
45.316.7
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.23.4
AK47 kills on a map
216.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
62.425.3
Damage (total/round)
45673
Player score (round)
46201012
Player score (round)
35411012
Player's aces
1
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
50%
Ancient
40%
Dust II
33%
Vertigo
30%
Overpass
17%
Nuke
10%
Inferno
5%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
50%
4
2
Ancient
67%
3
2
Dust II
100%
1
8
Vertigo
50%
4
4
Overpass
25%
4
1
Nuke
63%
8
3
Inferno
43%
7
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
5
20
Ancient
27%
11
6
Dust II
67%
3
9
Vertigo
80%
5
13
Overpass
42%
12
11
Nuke
53%
17
2
Inferno
48%
23
0
Info
Match analysis of FATE vs hREDS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FATE and hREDS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, and victory was secured by hREDS. The MVP of this match was shaiK.
hREDS analytics
The team hREDS secured 30 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for hREDS were LYNXi contributed 37 kills and eDi contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20238 overall damage.
On the defensive side, hREDS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FATE analytics
The team FATE managed to secure 23 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FATE were shaiK contributed 44 kills and rafftu contributed 45 kills. 18354 of total damage by FATE could not prevent hREDS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FATE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments